I don't want to assume that people know what I'm talking about when I discuss academia, because let's face it, it's a quirky path, and there are good reasons that few people choose it! Again, I don't expect this to make for the most fascinating reading. But I know that some of my family and friends might nevertheless enjoy having a clearer idea of what I'm doing and why.
First, to address some of the frequently asked questions...
- My doctoral program is in Historical Theology. (More on this in subsequent posts.)
- The program lasts a minimum of four years. (There's...no real maximum. There are some alarming stats for how long it takes people to complete their degree. My goal is five, and that would be a highly respectable length.)
- I'm currently going into the 2nd year of the program.
- During these first two years, I do coursework, much as I did in undergrad and in my Master's program. My seminars generally have between four and eight students in them.
- My third year will be devoted to proposing and researching my dissertation topic.
- The fourth and any subsequent years will be All Dissertation, All The Time.
- Unless I am teaching undergraduate survey courses. Right now, I am fortunate to be on a Fellowship that doesn't require me to be apprenticed to a faculty member as a Research Assistant. (Which is great, because it means that studying really gets to be my full-time job!) If I am offered the opportunity to teach, though (as most of the PhD students are), it will happen no earlier than Year 4.
Believe it or not, it's not because I love studying SO much that I desire to be a professional student. Mainly, I want to write. And teach. My dream situation, as of now, would be to teach theology/church history to undergraduates at a small Christian liberal arts college, perhaps in the type of "Great Books" Honors track Kevin graduated from.
Honestly, the idea of working with undergrads excites me more than working at a large research university or teaching Masters- or seminary-level students. I like the idea of punching holes in kids' presuppositions and getting them excited about perspectives they would never have considered, or authorities they would never have taken a second glance at. (Believe me, teaching theology, even to Christian youth, affords MANY such opportunities.)
I'll talk more later about why I want to teach theology specifically. Essentially, for me, the undergraduate setting is where the action is. I love the idea of having a hand in forming hearts and intellects during those years.
Note, though, that I referred to this as the "dream" scenario. Frankly, lots of PhD students want those small-liberal-arts-school posts right now. And there aren't that many of them to go around. The market stinks right now; that is just the reality. I need to be realistic about the fact that my ideal situation might not be realized right away, or ever -- especially since I'm married to someone who is working in an extremely similar field, and who will be seeking similar kinds of work (though he is looking to teach at a seminary, which is a little different)!
That's where, along with the realism, a little creativity comes in handy. Especially if I am able to launch something of a writing career (which, after all, is something I have always wanted, and which is a major part of academia anyway), then I think I can find various ways to put my degree to good use...even if it means taking on lower-paying adjunct jobs for awhile, or writing/consulting on curricula for churches, or who knows what else. I got enough enjoyment out of my brief stint teaching community college-level online courses to know that the work can be rewarding at any level. And that, if it's all I can get, I'm willing to work with it!
At any rate, I really don't know what my 30s will bring, especially since I want to have kids, also! The upshot is, I think it's silly to get too rigid about what I want my career to look like, at this early stage.
As you might have gathered, a PhD is a lot of work without the guarantee of a huge payoff. I'll admit, that's something I wish I had taken more seriously when I was 22 or even 25. I don't think it would have ultimately changed my plans -- but it's much easier, at 22, to think, "I don't care if I accumulate some debt, or that it'll take me longer to get my career started than my peers," than it is to live with the reality when you're a little older and married. I see people I went to high school with becoming homeowners, and we're living in a little apartment and driving a 20-year-old car. It isn't glamorous.
On the other hand, I get to devote my time to studying subjects that I love and find meaningful. I try to remind myself every day what a luxury that is. While I can't take a romanticized view of it, I know it's not a bad place to be.
Finally, I'd add that when I was little, I had this idea that PhDs were "the smartest people." Surely, if you had the brains, you had no choice but to advance to the highest possible degree. I know better now...some of the most intelligent people I have known had no degrees to their name, and I can confidently tell you that holding a doctoral degree does NOT mean you're a genius!
In reality, getting a PhD is a strange thing to do. I think the only difference between me and a well-read non-academic is that I read obscure books for a living and am required to argue about them with some degree of precision and originality. While one has to have intelligence to reach this level, I sometimes think the job, the academic lifestyle, is more about having a liking for, and the disposition to thrive in, a rather eccentric subculture, than it is about being "smart."
I'm not sure how good a job I've done answering the why question. Maybe this will help: in the next installment of this series, I'm planning to write about why I chose to study theology. To do that well, I may need to "rewind" a bit, to my storied Hollins and Yale days. :)
I love that you're my smart, well read friend and you still hang out with me. I suspect you and I need to have a girls' night in which our conversation isn't hijacked by our husbands. ;-)
ReplyDelete